Jump to content

Silvano Silva

Members
  • Posts

    460
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Silvano Silva

  • Birthday 11/16/1975

Recent Profile Visitors

4,803 profile views

Silvano Silva's Achievements

  1. For me, it was enough to have an SF2 to ZTN converter. This would make it easier as there are tons of more practical SF2 editors on the internet. I'm glad you bought Translator and gave your opinion, even if it wasn't very positive.
  2. DSP priorities. The MZ-X's DSP is an Insert. Choose sounds that don't have DSP in the instrument table. This is not a bug It's a Limitation
  3. My friend, the CT-X is a good keyboard but we cannot put it on the same level as, for example, an MZ-X or PX-560. The CT-X has a very good sound engine combined with a good DSP system. When you get tired of the CT-X sound, the PX-560 will still have resources for you to continue editing and creating new Sounds due to its great Synthesis capacity. Hexalayer, ADSR, polyphony are some of the PX that gain in quality. Not even the new PX have as many features as the PX-560 and PX-5S. The new ones are very good in terms of sound quality with the new sound engines.
  4. -BREAK- on the MZ-X it only adds a measure without sound and it is not possible to create a variation with this button. I have the CTX and the MZ-X but the MZ-X is much superior to the CT-X in terms of editing Rhythms , It has a Drawbar, Hexalayer and you can even add Sampled Sounds. The MZ-X was built to be the Top of the Line arranger by Casio while the CT-X is a MID LEVEL
  5. The PX 560 is another segment. It is a STAGE piano with arranger and synthesizer features. The PX has heavy keys which for a Pianist is the perfect instrument. The CTX is a new line of arrangers from Casio but it does not have all the sound editing features that the PX has. What's new about the CTX is its new AIX sound engine, but we can't compare the PX's pianos to the CTX's. As excellent as the CTX pianos are, the PX is already a superior piece of equipment in terms of playability.
  6. You are wrong. The fact that I want to put a tone on the Drum track is because I want it to be unaffected by the chord change. The Bass 220 on the CT-X has the Last Octave Slide effects. If you put, for example, one of these Slides on channel 3 Bass when changing the chord, the effect will not play because the different chord will change the position of the notes. Now if it can be placed in the percussion channel the Slide effect will remain active. In MZX I created drum kits with Slides Bass effects in the last octaves. On Yamaha keyboards you can put Slide bass on any channel because Yamaha has a NO CHORD function where you choose which Main or Fill the function is placed on.
  7. The Casio Keyboards I've had do not have this sound. On the Yamaha Tyros (also on the S900) this sound is magically far superior to any adaptation and editing that is done on the Casio. The ADSR on the Yamaha Start with a single wave and end with a small modulation. And when using Bend we have a very convincing sound. Casio has wisely added a Nylon guitar with Bend to the CT-X Line, as the MZX Line does not have this sound from the factory and it is necessary to sample an external sound. As for the name, I think ALOHA GUITAR. The important thing is that the proposed sound is close to the intended sound.
  8. The proper name is Pedal Steel. This sound doesn't even have on the MZX. I had to Sample a Tone from Tyros 2. But in this case, to get closer just editing a Jazz guitar.
  9. Hello. Why doesn't Casio release update 1.09 for old CT-X's? Has there been a change in hardware? Another detail is that Casio could release some functions in editing Styles such as being able to put Melodic Tones on Drum tracks. An example is the Bass 220 (VSTE.Bs1) where it would be possible to use a Slide effect from the Octaves above on one of channels 9 or 10. The Bass working on these Channels does not change chord changes, keeping the Slide Effect where we could use it in Fills or Intros.
  10. I don't know which country you are from, the name seems Brazilian. Here in Brazil, in addition to the Casio website having regional rhythms, there are also programmers who sell Rhythm packages at good prices. I am one of these Programmers. For those who don't have time or don't know how to program, buying Rhythms packages is an excellent option. https://www.casioteclados.com.br/ritmos/
  11. I'm sure that was it. Now to save ZAL without samples the keyboard works correctly. It is common for the MZ-X to corrupt SAMPLED TONES files in memory.
  12. The guy who created the topic has doubts about Backup ZAL and in this part MZX has a bug when saving Sampled ZTN. Please put a list of these non-Samples Bugs here. (This helps the community a lot even if Casio doesn't fix it) Just leave a detail that Bugs and Improvements are two different things. As for improvements, I have a list and as for Bugs, the most serious are regarding the use of Samples.
  13. The Critical BUGS in MZ-X are very much related to the Samples (ZTN with Waves) that are installed. There are many ways to practically end these problems by following a few rules. And these rules require auditing installed Tones and always Save ZTN separately.
  14. Welcome to another Casio MZ-X BUG. Always save all sorts of categories including independent sounds. Mistakes like this are mainly when sampled sounds are involved.
  15. This is the biggest complaint I have about the MZ-X. AC7 File does not work correctly in Midi pattern. A Yamaha Rhythm that has arrangements in major and minor chords you see in the DAW the first Midis channels being used 1-8 for minor and seventh arrangements. MZX does not support this import function, but interestingly, Internal Rhythms has these arrangements. Another detail is the confusing Chord Table in the Style edition. The MZ-X does not support chord deletion. (When you don't want an accompaniment instrument to play a certain chord like Minor, Seventh or Major)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.