Jump to content
Video Files on Forum ×

MTapani

Members
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://www.youtube.com/user/tapanimusic

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Finland

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

MTapani's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • Collaborator Rare
  • First Post
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

10

Reputation

  1. And now Yamaha has released some new "Portasound" keyboards 😲
  2. Cool but where’s the Casiotone with minikeys? I hope we see a new version of the SA-series re-branded as Casiotone.
  3. Thanks for the style although I wasn't completely satisfied with it. Ended up changing some stuff, drums etc. to give it more of an 80's Russian/italodisco-sound. Standard set 4 with added reverb works quite well when trying to get the 80's feel. It has that powerful snare-sound required in music like this.
  4. Great demos 👍. Now that Casio has improved their sound-chip, they should really focus on making better keybeds. I guess the keys are just as flimsy, noisy and cheap as those in the MZ-X series?
  5. No reason to be sad. You can just update the sound of your Privia with Pianoteq or some sample-software and get way better sound. That's what I did with my Roland-piano, which has a poor mono-sound. That got old really fast. Older Privias are good and the keybed works for even more challenging classical pieces, so no reason really to upgrade. I don't think there's much improvement in the key-touch of these new Privias. Probably just as loud. That has been a common Casio "feature" for years across their entire keyboard-library. And hammer-action is always going to be loud because of how the mechanism works.
  6. Even the cheapest Privia PX-160 (about 460 euros around here it seems) has string- and damper-resonance, so it's not really necessary to invest over 1000 euros/dollars/whatever for greater sound. But for me, the most important thing is the feel of those keys.
  7. Nice. I might need to sell my Roland-piano and get this if it really does have a good weighted keyboard like in the Privia-models. I like the very small and compact size. Saves lots of space. Too bad there's no damper- or string resonance but I can use Pianoteq on my PC when I want the best piano-sound, so it's not a big problem.
  8. Is there really a need for 76-keys hammer-action keyboard? Hammer-action means piano and piano is 88-keys. You need the full set of keys if you're serious about piano-playing.
  9. Apparently there will be a new arranger-keyboard with 88, fully-weighted piano keys:
  10. Yup, that would be a great feature to have on Casio boards too. It takes up valuable space when I have to copy one of the preset-styles.
  11. Yes I have and they sound much better. It's a bit strange that those were not available as factory presets. Seems like the arranger-side of this instrument was rushed and Casio didn't have time to upgrade all the sounds.
  12. One thing that bothers my about the factory-rhythms on my MZ-X500 is the use of GM-instruments. Why make a good sound-engine and then for the most part, only use basic GM-sounds? Why Casio didn't update all the rhythms to include better instruments? Of course it's easy to edit them and that's what I usually do for my most-used rhythms but it doesn't give a good first impression of the instruments capabilities and sound-quality. Is the CT-X series any different or does those still use inferior GM-sounds in many of the rhythms?
  13. My relaxed version of an old traditional Finnish Christmas-song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB8mzjrgbQo
  14. I don’t know what Casio was thinking when they put such a cheap keyboard on pro-level, expensive instrument. My Microarranger and Reface YC were cheaper but both are built better and there’s no annoying clicketyclack-sound. Now that Casio has improved their sound across all their products, they should focus on fixing the keyboard and ditch that old, obviously flawed design.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.