Jump to content
Video Files on Forum ×

Vent or Burn?


trancedelicbluesman

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
On 4/20/2019 at 6:44 PM, Gypsysinger1 said:

I'm using the Lester K and really like it. its worth checking out.

Thanks. I have, now, and it does seem sweet. Even better, for me, might be the Lester G because it has compression; a real b3 has a bit of compression in the sound the more drawbars you pull and the more keys you press.

 

I also thought the Tech 21 Roto Choir looked pretty awesome. That one is unfortunately out of production.

 

You gotta love Mike Mathews of EH:

 

https://youtu.be/A-rlX104mJg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're looking purely for the Leslie effect have to lean you towards the Vent. There are things I LOVE about the Burn including: 

  • Presets
  • Reverb after the Leslie
  • Tube overdrive
  • MIDI Control

So for Leslie only the Vent is just better.  That being said the Burn can do some other effects which could be cool.  I won't sell my Burn because I'll want to use it with a Rhodes or Clavinet just for the overdrive and other effects.  Somewhere I have some A/B recordings I made with both.  Let me see if you can find them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was done a little while back - here were my settings.  Just held a chord and let the pedals do their thing:

 

1.  Vent
2.  Burn 147 Setting (tube on, overdrive level 6)
3.  Burn 122 Setting (tube on, overdrive level 6)
4.  Burn X/Y Setting (tube on, overdrive level 6)
5.  Burn Rock2 Setting (tube on, overdrive level 6)

 

Vent vs Burn.mp3

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2019 at 10:55 AM, Mike Martin said:

This was done a little while back - here were my settings.  Just held a chord and let the pedals do their thing:

 

1.  Vent
2.  Burn 147 Setting (tube on, overdrive level 6)
3.  Burn 122 Setting (tube on, overdrive level 6)
4.  Burn X/Y Setting (tube on, overdrive level 6)
5.  Burn Rock2 Setting (tube on, overdrive level 6)

 

Vent vs Burn.mp3

Nice. You say you "just held a chord" but I was hearing a pleasant bit of organ drone music with a subtle repeating melody. The different iterations did have subtle differences but honestly both pedals sound fantastic. Need I say much better than the xwp1 by itself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been fooling around with this through the PX560, 350 and XW-P1. 

 

https://www.casiomusicforums.com/index.php?/topic/16149-line-6-roto-machine-leslie-simulator/&tab=comments#comment-49536

 

Now that I can hear Mike's results with the Burn and Neo-Ventilator, I'll try to work up a demo using the Line 6 for comparison. I'd guess the Line 6 is not as realistic sounding, but I'll listen to each again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night I hooked up my xw to my zoom g5 which I already own; it has a rotary effect complete with overdrive and bottom rotor. I was pleased with my initial results but I feel a need for further tweaking. I did like the sound of it. Much better than the xw rotary and the zoom overdrive sounded authentic. I found myself playing the organ part from Joe Cocker's rendition of A Little Help From My Friends. Always a good sign when you start out auditioning a piece of gear and wind up just playing music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Without uploading soundfiles-after alot of monitoring-the Line 6 is not quite up to the Neoventilator or Burn. It isn't terrible, pretty close but what it is lacking in comparison-not hearing a realistic enough lower speaker growl and rotation effect compared to its more expensive counterparts. The rotaing upper horns seem to have a little bit too much vibrato for my taste too and this can't be dialed down.  Also doesn't sound quite as clean a signal through the pedal, but then really was designed for a guitar's output although the connections are working fine connected to line in and outs. Has some decent setting variations-3 different type of Leslie settings-mostly some kind of filtering there, and continuously variable pots for slow and fast speeds, continuouslt variable overdrive as well as 3 settings for slow, medium, fast changeovers for ramping up and down. I'd use it for live work, but recording quality maybe not. /certainly not as smooth and full a sound as a real Leslie-definitely still better than stock built-in rotary DSPs in the Casios I have in terms of more audible and realistic rotary effects. Then again, for the money-alot less expensive than any other Leslie effect I've seen. I will keep mine I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.